My Hemorrhoid Clinic

About HAE

About HEMBO™

HEMBO™ Procedure

A Revolutionary Approach to Treating Hemorrhoids

HEMBO™ (Hemorrhoid Artery Embolization) is emerging as a groundbreaking, minimally invasive treatment for internal hemorrhoids. It offers significant advantages over traditional methods, providing long-lasting symptom relief with minimal discomfort and a rapid recovery.

A procedure of putting catheter
A girl holding tissue roll

What is HEMBO? (Hemorrhoid Artery Embolization)

HEMBO™, also known as the “emborrhoid” technique, is a minimally invasive endovascular procedure performed by interventional radiologists to treat internal hemorrhoids. It works by reducing blood flow to the hemorrhoids through the occlusion of the arteries that supply them, thereby alleviating symptoms such as bleeding, pain, and prolapse.

Procedure Overview

  • A small puncture (2–3 mm) is made in the groin or wrist to access the arterial system.

  • Under X-ray guidance, a microcatheter is navigated through the arteries to the branches of the superior rectal artery that supply the hemorrhoids.

  • Tiny coils or embolic particles are delivered through the catheter to block blood flow to the hemorrhoidal tissue.

  • The procedure typically takes about 45 minutes and is performed under local anesthesia with moderate sedation.

A hand with surgical gloves on it

Advantages of HEMBO

Minimally Invasive and Painless

Hembo™ requires no incisions, ensuring minimal pain and a quick recovery.

Quick Outpatient Procedure

Hembo™ is an outpatient, with same-day discharge after recovery.

Preservation of Anal Anatomy

Hembo™ preserves the anal canal, avoiding complications such as incontinence or stenosis.

High Recovery Success Rate

80-85% of patients improve within 2-4 weeks; 90% report no bleeding.

Comparison to Other Treatment Options

Treatment Invasiveness Anesthesia Recovery Time Success Rate Recurrence Risk
HEMBO (HAE)
Minimally invasive
Local + sedation
2-3 days
80-85%
Low
Rubber Band Ligation
Minimally invasive
None/local
1-2 weeks
70-80%
Moderate
Surgical Hemorrhoidectomy
Invasive
General
2-4 weeks
95%
Low
Conservative Management
Non-invasive
None
N/A
Variable
High

Find out if you are a candidate

Arrow iron

Candidacy for HEMBO

HEMBO™ is most effective for internal hemorrhoids of grade 1-3 that have not responded to conservative management or other minimally invasive treatments. It is particularly suitable for patients who wish to avoid surgery or have not benefited from surgical interventions.

Contraindications

HEMBO™ may not be suitable for:

  • Grade 4 internal hemorrhoids

  • Patients with acute hemorrhoidal complications

  • Those with a history of colorectal surgery

  • Patients with chronic anal fissures

Comparison before HEMO and after

Frequently Asked Questions

Success Rates

HEMBO™ demonstrates high success rates for symptom improvement:
Current evidence suggests that HEMBO™ provides lasting relief:
HEMBO™ shows favorable outcomes in terms of recurrence and the need for retreatment:
Many patients report high levels of satisfaction with HEMBO™ due to its minimally invasive nature and effectiveness in symptom relief.
The long-term effectiveness of HEMBO™ may vary depending on several factors:
HEMBO™ offers several advantages over traditional treatments in terms of long-term relief:
Based on available information, HEMBO™ (HAE) appears to have minimal long-term side effects. Below are the key points regarding the long-term safety and effects of this procedure:
1. Grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids:
2. Grade 4 hemorrhoids:
3. Overall success rates:
4. Long-term results:
5. Repeat procedures:
Recovery time following HEMBO (HAE) is generally quick across various grades of hemorrhoids, with several key highlights:
1. Overall recovery:
2. Outpatient procedure:
3. Minimal pain and downtime:
4. Grade-specific information:

While there is no specific recovery time defined for each grade of hemorrhoids, recovery is generally quick (2–3 days) for grades 1 to 3, which are the primary candidates for this procedure. The recovery time appears to be similar across these grades, with the main difference being the effectiveness of the treatment rather than the duration of recovery.

Scroll to Top